Tag: chief-legal-officer

  • Patent Prosecution: The Intellectual Weightlifting That Powers Strategic Legal Thinking

    Originally published on LinkedIn | July 27, 2025

    After four years away from patent prosecution, I recently found myself face-to-face with a final office action. What happened next surprised me.

    Muscle Memory Never Forgets

    I’m blown away by how much I remember. My muscle memory even kicked in when I almost keyed in the Word macros I had programmed years ago for phrases like “Currently Amended” – at the last second I remembered I don’t have those set up anymore!

    But what struck me most was realizing something I’ve been downplaying: the sheer mental intensity this work demands.

    The Pattern of Minimizing Excellence

    I have this odd habit of minimizing my accomplishments. Like graduating from UT Austin with a Bachelor’s in electrical engineering in 3.5 years with stellar grades. Or starting at Intel when I was 20. Or graduating law school with a baby. Or passing the bar exam while heavily sick during my first trimester (I was so sick I couldn’t study the month before and had to sit next to the bathrooms during the exam).

    So maybe I shouldn’t be surprised that I’ve also downplayed the insane mental sharpness it takes to do patent prosecution successfully for nine years.

    Patent Prosecution = Intellectual Weightlifting

    Here’s what patent prosecution actually demands: You’re holding multiple complex technical and legal concepts in your mind simultaneously while building arguments that must withstand patent examiners actively trying to poke holes in your work AND keeping in mind how those arguments you’re making today might be held against you by a future judge, jury, or opposing counsel.

    It’s intellectual weightlifting at the highest level.

    Cognitive Muscles That Never Fade

    What amazes me is how these cognitive muscles never really went away. Not only did they never go away, they’ve been quietly powering everything I’ve done since:

    The same laser focus that patent drafting requires enabled me to systematically document complex legal issues in my corporate roles.

    The same precision needed for claim construction helped me persuade a rather difficult and notoriously argumentative corporate client that prior licenses didn’t cover the scope of their current security audit request. (You best believe I showed up to that meeting with a pseudo claim chart!)

    The same systematic thinking that patent prosecution demands has been essential for reviewing public-facing security communications, catching contract inconsistencies, and architecting legal frameworks for emerging technologies.

    More Than a Legal Specialty

    I’m starting to realize patent prosecution isn’t just a legal specialty – it’s cognitive training that teaches you to think with systematic precision that transfers to every complex problem you encounter.

    Whether I’m serving as CLO for emerging technology organizations, negotiating $35M+ IP transactions, or building governance frameworks for AI and XR technologies, those foundational patent prosecution skills are the engine powering strategic legal thinking.

    The Cognitive Flexibility Advantage

    Am I still handling general corporate matters? Absolutely. I recently reviewed an MSA and am helping build several from scratch. The switch between patent work and general corporate legal work was initially challenging, but I’ve discovered that the same cognitive flexibility that makes me effective at patent prosecution also makes me highly adaptable across different legal domains.

    Why Patent Prosecution Experience Matters

    For anyone wondering if patent prosecution is “worth it” if you plan to move into other legal areas: absolutely yes. This intellectual rigor creates a problem-solving foundation that serves you everywhere.

    As someone now operating as CLO across multiple emerging technology organizations, I can definitively say that patent prosecution training is invaluable preparation for any complex legal challenge. It teaches you to:

    • Think systematically under pressure
    • Anticipate counterarguments before they arise
    • Build bulletproof logical frameworks
    • Communicate complex technical concepts clearly
    • Adapt quickly between different cognitive demands

    The Compound Effect

    Apparently, foundational skills compound over time. The mental discipline I developed during nine years of patent prosecution continues to pay dividends as I architect legal frameworks for technologies that didn’t exist when I first started practicing law.

    That’s the power of intellectual weightlifting – the strength you build transfers to every challenge you encounter.


    Aruna Ghatak-Roy is a strategic legal executive currently serving as CLO for dual emerging technology organizations while providing fractional general counsel services to various client organizations. She combines electrical engineering expertise with extensive patent prosecution experience and corporate legal leadership.

    Schedule a consultation to discuss how systematic legal thinking can solve your complex challenges.